Saturday, April 04, 2020: 11:00am - 12:20pm -
Joan Beaudoin, Wayne State University, United States
Online collections are able to extend the multiple important functions of museums to many individuals beyond the confines of museum walls. Thus, this paper examines the availability of, and ease of access to, art museum collections presented online via institutional web sites. Focusing on art museum collections in the United States, this project analyzes the data behind the representation of museum objects in the online setting to codify and report on shared descriptive and multimedia practices. Furthermore, it highlights common difficulties (e.g., determining the sort order of retrieved items, and the meaning of field labels) visitors experience while examining online collections. This presentation seeks to clarify the current state of the art surrounding online art museum collections and provide context for why studies of visitors to museum web sites report limited use of online collections. Questions concerning the fundamental features of online collection access, such as what percentage of collections are available online and the semantic commonalities found across museums, are explored and allow us to reflect upon how far museums have extended their reach.
American Alliance of Museums. (2000). Ethics, standards, and professional practices. Retrieved from: https://www.aam-us.org/programs/ethics-standards-and-professional-practices/code-of-ethics-for-museums/
Association of Art Museum Directors. (2011). Professional practices in art museums. Retrieved from: https://aamd.org/sites/default/files/document/2011ProfessionalPracitiesinArtMuseums.pdf
Beaudoin, J. E., & Brady, J. E. (2011). Finding visual information: a study of image resources used by archaeologists, architects, art historians, and artists. Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America, 30(2), 24-36.
Bearman, D. (2008). Representing museum knowledge. In P. Marty & K. Burton Jones (Eds.), Museum informatics. People, information, and technology in museums, (pp. 35-57). New York: Routledge.
Capriotti, P., Carretón, C., & Castillo, A. (2016). Testing the level of interactivity of institutional websites: From museums 1.0 to museums 2.0. International Journal of Information Management, 36(1), 97-104.
Ellenbogen, K., Falk, J., & Goldman, K. H. (2008). Understanding the Motivations of Museum Audiences. In P. Marty & K. Burton Jones (Eds.), Museum informatics. People, information, and technology in museums, (pp. 187-194). New York: Routledge.
Elwick, A. R. (2013). Non-formal learning in museums and galleries. (Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University).
Fortier, A. & Ménard, E. (2017). Laying the Ground for DOLMEN: Offering a Simple Standardization Starts with Understanding What Museums Do. Knowledge Organization, 44(7), 485-493.
Kabassi, K. (2016). Evaluating websites of museums: State of the art. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 24, 184-196.
Keene, S. (2006). Fragments of the world: uses of museum collections. New York: Routledge.
Lopatovska, I. (2015). Museum website features, aesthetics, and visitors’ impressions: a case study of four museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 30(3), 191-207.
López, X., Margapoti, I., Maragliano, R., & Bove, G. (2010). The presence of Web 2.0 tools on museum websites: a comparative study between England, France, Spain, Italy, and the USA. Museum Management and Curatorship, 25(2), 235-249.
Marty, P. (2008a). Information representation. In P. Marty & K. Burton Jones (Eds.), Museum informatics. People, information, and technology in museums, (pp. 30-34). New York: Routledge.
Marty, P. (2008b). Museum websites and museum visitors: digital museum resources and their use. Museum Management and Curatorship, 23(1), 81-99.
Matusiak, K. K. (2006). Towards user-centered indexing in digital image collections. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 22(4), 283-298.
Pallas, J., & Economides, A. A. (2008). Evaluation of art museums' web sites worldwide. Information Services & Use, 28(1), 45-57.
Peacock, D. (2008). The information revolution in museums. In P. Marty & K. Burton Jones (Eds.), Museum informatics. People, information, and technology in museums, (pp. 59-76). New York: Routledge.
Stewart, S. & Nullman, S. (2018). Visitor motivation survey and audience segmentation for the Whitney Museum of Art website. Retrieved from: https://museumsdigitalculture.prattsi.org/visitor-motivation-survey-and-audience-segmentation-for-the-whitney-museum-of-art-website-acafa5397a3a
Trant, J. (2006). Social classification and folksonomy in art museums: Early data from the steve.museum tagger prototype. 17th Annual ASIS&T SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, 1-30. doi: 10.7152/acro.v17i1.12495
Villaespesa, E. (2017). Who are the users of the Met's online collection? Retrieved from: https://metmuseum.org/blogs/collection-insights/2017/online-collection-user-research
Whelan, G. (2015). Understanding the social value and well-being benefits created by museums: A case for social return on investment methodology. Arts & Health, 7(3), 216-230.
Williams, D. (2010). A brief history of museum computerization. In R. Parry (Ed.), Museums in a digital age, (pp. 30-36). New York: Routledge.
Zorich, D. M. (2008). Information policy in museums. In P. Marty & K. Burton Jones (Eds.), Museum informatics. People, information, and technology in museums, (pp. 85-106). New York: Routledge.