Losing our Heads: Leveraging Headless Content Management Systems to Bridge Dynamic Web Interfaces and Backend Content

Radha Nagaraja, National September 11 Memorial and Museum, USA


While modern-day content management systems (CMSs) provide very easy-to-use interfaces for managing content as well as functionalities to build web interfaces, the front-end development functionalities in CMSs are often optimized for specific structures of web interfaces (e.g., built-in themes). On the other hand, modern web development frameworks enable rapid development of dynamic, responsive, and accessible interfaces. The natural question is whether it would be possible to bridge the best of both worlds (i.e., easy content maintainability of CMSs and rapid and flexible implementation using web development frameworks). A strategy that has been gaining popularity is to leverage the content management functionalities of CMSs via a headless mode and couple the headless CMS with a front-end rich web interface that is separately developed and communicates with the headless CMS via an API, thus decoupling the presentation from the back-end data. In this paper, we will outline the general architectural principles of this hybrid methodology and the various technology ingredients that enable this approach. We will also take a detailed look at one particular recent example in which we have employed this hybrid strategy, namely our "Timeline" website that renders an interactive timeline of the events of 9/11 along with various media content within a rich and responsive user interface. This website was developed using headless Drupal as the back-end CMS and JavaScript libraries for the front-end. We will also outline various aspects of general applicability including integration strategies, overhead, and performance implications of decoupled implementations, strategies such as prerendering and caching to achieve higher overall performance, and automated testing methodologies for dynamic websites.

Keywords: content management system (CMS), headless Drupal, dynamic websites, APIs, front-end, back-end


Modern-day content management systems (CMSs) such as Drupal and Joomla provide very easy-to-use interfaces for managing content of different types (text, media, etc.) and associated taxonomies and interrelationships. In addition, most CMSs provide functionalities to build front-end web interfaces for rendering static and dynamic content for both anonymous and authenticated user sessions. However, the front-end development functionalities in CMSs are often optimized for specific structures of these web interfaces (e.g., using built-in themes). When a particular site’s intended design fits within the scope of the off-the-shelf themes in a CMS (e.g., stores, blogs), then the CMS-provided front-end website development tools provide essentially a one-stop shop for implementing a website and managing the back-end content. On the other hand, when developing a website with a richer web interface, other frameworks (e.g., React and Angular JavaScript frameworks) are often more suitable and enable rapid development of a wide variety of dynamic, responsive, and accessible interfaces. However, directly managing content within the context of these frameworks (e.g., using a custom back-end CMS) is not a particularly attractive option and might not even be feasible when the content is to be managed by a diverse set of people.

The natural question therefore is whether it would be possible to somehow bridge the best of both worlds (i.e., the easy content maintainability of CMSs and the rapid and flexible implementation capabilities of dynamic web development frameworks). Such a hybrid decoupled methodology would indeed provide an ideal solution. To this end, an elegant strategy that has been gaining popularity in recent years (Schadler & Grannan, 2017; Heslop, 2018) is to leverage the content management functionalities of CMSs via a headless mode and combine the headless CMS with a front-end rich web interface that is separately developed and communicates with the headless CMS via an Application Programming Interface (API). With this strategy (illustrated in Figure 1), the front-end web interface uses CMS APIs to query for data that is required for rendering the web pages. All the templates/styles for the actual rendering are implemented within the front-end layer while the content is managed from within the CMS. This decouples the presentation from the back-end data in the CMS and enables a modular solution wherein the front-end interface and the content are each managed using the most conducive tools for the purpose. This is essentially the headless CMS approach in a nutshell.

In this paper, we will outline the broad architectural principles and implementation strategies of this hybrid methodology and specific details of a particular recently developed website, namely our “Timeline” website (developed as a replacement for https://timeline.911memorial.org) that presents an interactive timeline of the events of 9/11 along with various media content within an interactive user interface. This paper is organized as follows. We will first discuss the current trend of dynamic websites and more broadly rich user interfaces which bring together multiple aspects including interactivity, incremental updates, responsive interfaces, accessibility, and multi-modal/multi-platform interfaces to enable a seamless and rich user experience. We will then discuss the content management capabilities of current-day CMSs and the functionalities they provide for facilitating storage, administration, and retrieval of structured content of various types. We will then describe strategies for interfacing a headless CMS back-end to a separately developed front-end. We will then take a closer look at the technical details involved in development of the Timeline website, which provides an illustrative example of this hybrid methodology. Finally, we provide concluding remarks, acknowledgments, and references.


Coupled and decoupled architectures. Decoupled design facilitates development of multiple front-ends that pull from the same back-end CMS.

Figure 1: Coupled and decoupled design architectures.

Dynamic Websites and Rich User Interfaces

Over recent years, dynamic and rich user interfaces are becoming more prevalent to enable seamless user experiences. This ongoing trend of user interface evolution involves two primary overarching facets: interactivity and adaptability. These two facets can be seen to be the key motivating factors from multiple viewpoints. Firstly, unlike the static web pages of the 90s, current-day websites provide rich interactivity, which is progressively becoming more seamless by enabling fast interactive updates of elements in a web page without visible reloads or indeed without even making it apparent to the user that any additional data was fetched from the server or that any code was run to update the page display. This is particularly seen in the evolution from web sites to web applications wherein a browser-hosted web page provides the visual interactive feel of a native (e.g., desktop or mobile) application. Secondly, the trend of increasing adaptability is evident in multiple directions including to the device platform (e.g., mobile, audio, augmented and virtual reality), situational context (e.g., location-dependent), and specific user needs (e.g., accessibility).

Modern user interfaces have evolved significantly beyond browser-based interfaces and now encompass a wide range of modalities (i.e., user interaction methods and presentation formats) such as audio (e.g., conversational interfaces such as Amazon Alexa and Google Home), augmented reality and virtual reality systems such as Google Glass and Oculus Quest, smart watches and other gadgets, and Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices, in addition to computer and mobile/handheld platforms.  While these user interfaces are extremely varied in their “form factors” and the types of technology stacks used to develop and deploy these interfaces, a requirement essentially common to all interface modalities is to be able to configure the underlying content to be “displayed” via these interfaces.  Furthermore, since it is becoming increasingly common for businesses (specifically museums) to provide apps via multiple interface modalities (e.g., mobile and desktop apps, web app, and an Alexa app, as well as via business calendar and social media platforms), it would be highly desirable to be able to configure the underlying content in a single back-end system. This would enable scalability in terms of front-ends (Figure 1) while retaining ease of content administration via a single back-end so that the underlying content can be reflected onto multiple front-end interfaces. A headless CMS therefore provides a very attractive solution by enabling leveraging the ease-of-use content administration functionalities of a CMS (as discussed further in the next section below) while being able to integrate the content into different technology “stacks” for various front-end interfaces.

While a headless CMS provides an attractive solution approach for a variety of front-end interfaces as discussed above, we focus below on dynamic websites in particular with the Timeline website being one representative recent example. A key part of the “dynamic” nature of modern websites is seamless interactivity wherein the user can interact with a page and load desired content with minimal delays. Another key part is the ability of the web page to adapt itself to the device (e.g., responsive to the device form factor and resolution) and user needs (e.g., accessibility for visually impaired users). This dynamism relies upon context-aware code execution both on the server-side and the client-side and includes, in general, the following components:

  • On an initial request to the server by the web browser (optionally along with information regarding the device/browser using, for example, the User-Agent request header), the server-side code (e.g., PHP code implemented as a custom module integrated with a CMS) assembles a web page and returns it to the web browser and also indicates additional files that would be required for the display of the web page (e.g., JavaScript, CSS, and additional HTML files).
  • On the client-side, the web browser executes JavaScript code on-demand (e.g., based on user actions, other events such as elapsing of a specific amount of time, etc.). The JavaScript code can then modify the page content. If the modification requires retrieving of additional data from the server, the JavaScript code sends a request to the server with the parameters for the request (e.g., specifying what data is to be retrieved) typically encoded as a query string appended to the URL (e.g., ?id=1234).
  • On receiving a request from the JavaScript code, the server executes the appropriate code for the query (e.g., based on a routing table mapping queries to functions in the code) and encodes the result of running this server-side code in a form that can be transmitted back to the client-side JavaScript code. This encoding, which essentially entails a serialization (i.e., mapping the data structure resulting from running the server-side code into a “serialized” sequence of bytes) that typically utilizes the JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) format. An XML format used to be commonly utilized in earlier years instead of JSON as reflected by the acronym AJAX (Asynchronous JavaScript + XML) for this approach for dynamic webpage updates.
  • On receiving the serialized response from the server, the client-side JavaScript code executes a callback function (that is identified based on, for example, either the contents of the response or a routing callback table that is set up prior to the request to the server) that then updates the actual page contents. To efficiently identify the elements/components on a page, the Document Object Model (DOM) is most commonly used, which represents a web page as a tree structure wherein the nodes hierarchically represent parts of a page.

While the overall “feedback loop” in dynamic webpage updates is as summarized above (and graphically illustrated in Figure 2), it can be seen that there is considerable flexibility in terms of the specifics of how the server-side and client-side systems are structured and how the actual work for incremental page updates is distributed between the server-side and client-side. A noteworthy point in this regard is the recent resurgence of “static” webpages wherein the dynamism is accomplished purely by client-side JavaScript code with the server-side content being simply static files. These static files however are often generated using code, i.e., using static site generators such as Hugo (https://gohugo.io) and Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com), wherein high-level templating engines and programmatic content and layout specifications are used to generate collections of static files that are deployed to the server.

Using the approach outlined above for dynamic webpage updates, it is, in fact, possible to make an entire website a single page wherein after initial page load, all subsequent updates are done as incremental changes to a page without ever explicitly navigating to a different page. Such a “single-page application” enables a much more dynamic and responsive feel to the user wherein instead of navigating from page to page, a single page is dynamically rewritten wherein the parts (e.g., header, footer, sidebars, menus) that remain the same are not ever fetched again from the server and indeed not even “drawn” again on the browser. In order to address some of the nuances with single page applications such as enabling bookmarking specific pages or sharing select links to social channels, the location of the user within the single-page application can be encoded in the URL path and routes can be defined to automatically reopen the same location that was bookmarked/shared. Current-day web application frameworks such as Angular (https://angular.io) and React (https://reactjs.org) enable efficient development of dynamic web pages including single page applications based on the strategies outlined above.


Client-side JavaScript code in the browser and server-side code integrated with the CMS interact to enable dynamic webpage updates.

Figure 2: Interaction of client-side and server-side code to enable dynamic webpage updates.

Content Management Systems (CMSs)

CMSs both for specific domains (e.g., Collective Access for museums, https://www.collectiveaccess.org) and for general use cases (e.g., Drupal, https://www.drupal.org, WordPress, https://wordpress.com) have been developed over several years. Current-day CMSs integrate a wide variety of functionalities that facilitate content management and are therefore highly preferable to use instead of a special-purpose custom CMS built for managing content for a specific website. While it might initially appear that a simple repository of media files and associated metadata (e.g., via key-value stores in, for example, a schemaless MongoDB (https://www.mongodb.com) database) could be sufficient for back-end content management for a website, it is often the case that websites very quickly outgrow such simple needs and eventually require various CMS-standard functionalities. Ease of content administration is, of course, the most important benefit of using an actual CMS since managing media repositories and metadata directly is not a user-friendly solution for a content administrator. CMSs such as Drupal provide a rich structure for defining taxonomies (i.e., vocabularies) to accurately represent the semantics of the content. Furthermore, CMSs provide features such as content tagging and integrated search.

Additionally, some features built into the back-end admin/editorial UI (user interface) include, for example, user authentication, management of permissions by role and author, revision history and change management, log messages, available security updates, cache statistics, and overall site status reports. Such functionalities come “for free” compared to managing flat content as media repositories with metadata wherein keeping track of when and by whom a particular content was reconfigured itself requires custom solutions. Also, CMSs typically allow individual settings to be accommodated in the admin UI to fit individual workflows and preferences. The admin UI is usually optimized for speed of response to facilitate management of large content repositories. Furthermore, even if a separate system is used for front-end page layout in a headless solution, parts of the CMS front-end functionalities can still be used to configure aspects of the front-end display (e.g., high-level structures such as menus, integration of specific CMS-provided modules such as stores and blogs, using the CMS admin UI to configure metadata for the front-end such as theme settings).

Hence, instead of developing a custom data store, it is often a good strategy to use a CMS with a well-developed admin/editorial user interface (UI) and associated functionalities to manage the back-end content, but in a headless mode, i.e., without using the CMS to manage the webpage layout and display, but instead retrieving needed content using an API as illustrated in Figure 3. While the webpage front-end development in a coupled mode of the CMS utilizes, for example, a  WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) editor or other CMS-inbuilt page layout functionalities, the headless mode relies instead upon the CMS API (e.g., using REST — Representational State Transfer) to access data and other key functions of the CMS and relies upon a separate system for the actual front-end display. Thus, the CMS is used for its main purpose of storing, administering, and retrieving structured content (i.e., content such as media files along with its semantic context) while however decoupling the CMS from where or how the content will be displayed. This approach also enables separation of concerns wherein the content administrator does not need to be necessarily concerned about how the content is going to be displayed. This can also be seen to better fits the “agile” development philosophy. Content development and front-end development can happen simultaneously based on a structured API-based interface between the back-end and front-end systems. Incremental updates on both the back-end and front-end can happen independently. Furthermore, this decoupled approach enables the workflow and development tools/interfaces to be less cluttered since each group of people only needs to care about their aspect of the work (content creation vs. front-end development). Also, this architecture intrinsically enables scalability and plurality of front-ends since content configured by the content administrator from within a CMS admin UI can be transparently reflected onto multiple front-ends without additional effort.


A decoupled approach showing the headless CMS used for page creation and updates. The content is shared to the front-end via the API and finally the formatted page is created and rendered on the client browser.

Figure 3: Decoupling of the back-end CMS and the front-end interface using a headless CMS approach.

In addition to headless modes of more traditional CMSs such as Drupal and WordPress, more recent CMSs built primarily/only for headless operation (i.e., “API-first” CMSs) such as Storyblok (https://www.storyblok.com), Contentful (https://www.contentful.com), and Prismic (https://prismic.io) are attractive choices for development of Content as a Service (CaaS) solutions, which can be viewed as an adaptation of the Software as a Service (SaaS) model to content delivery.

Interfacing the Headless CMS to the Web Front-End

As discussed in the two sections above, the dynamic interaction between the front-end system (JavaScript code being run in the browser) and the back-end system (web server and CMS and any other server-side code) involves queries from the front-end to the back-end (e.g., GET requests), response from the back-end (e.g., JSON serialized data structures), and incremental updates of the web page at the front-end. This process is asynchronous since the front-end does not “pause” while waiting for a response from the server, but instead arranges for a callback function to be invoked when the response is received. While much of the details of the dynamic interactions are as in any dynamic website, there are some specific nuances in the context of a headless CMS as discussed below.

Current-day CMSs that support headless operation typically provide inbuilt REST API and JSON serialization functionalities and often also interfaces to configure REST API endpoints (e.g., Drupal’s REST Web Services module). While these inbuilt functionalities can provide quick and easy access to content entities and their fields, one aspect to consider is that a web application typically requires specific subsets of content when rendering different pages. To query for the required data via the built-in API of the CMS might not be directly possible or at least not efficient. Instead, a custom module (as, for example, in the Timeline website discussed in the next section) might need to be developed integrated with the CMS to specifically service requests from the front-end for the application as illustrated in Figure 3. The custom module implements essentially a domain-specific language (i.e., DSL) embedded into the CMS and custom-designed for efficient interaction with the front-end for the specific application (e.g., to retrieve the specific hierarchical data structures that are required for a website, to simultaneously retrieve sets of related data that are all required at the same time for a webpage update rather than requiring separate queries, etc.). Technologies such as GraphQL, https://graphql.org (a data query and manipulation language that can be used, for example, to precisely specify what data structures to retrieve regarding, for instance, entities and entity collections in the CMS) can be used to facilitate development of a custom module.

Regarding performance, there are some subtle trade-offs to be cognizant about. A coupled solution (wherein the front-end is built using layout functionalities integrated into the CMS) can benefit from multi-level caching capabilities built into the CMS. In particular, since the CMS is aware of when each piece of content has been updated, the cache invalidation can utilize logic based on content updates to optimize the use of caches. In a decoupled solution, the page load performance can be better since the front-end pages to be sent to the browser can be stored as static files rather than being built at load time by PHP code in the CMS. However, the retrieving of content from the CMS can be slower unless care is taken to ensure that the CMS caching capabilities are being used effectively. While not necessarily out-of-the-box as in coupled mode, the caching capabilities can be enabled by making the REST API functions cognizant of cached contents and fetching from cache whenever possible. For optimal performance, load balancing and third-party caching systems for DDOS (Distributed Denial of Service) protection can also be utilized in addition to caching at the CMS and web server levels. Another point to note is the overhead associated with communication between a custom module and the back-end CMS. In particular, for example, the custom module which essentially mediates communication between the web server and the CMS back-end might be hosted on a machine different from the CMS itself in which case the interaction would be via a web-based API (e.g., REST) and network latency and bandwidth limitations would need to be carefully addressed. Prerendering and caching strategies can help in alleviating some of this overhead. Commonly accessed pages/sub-pages/views can be prerendered by the custom module and cached so that new requests are serviced directly from the cache instead of having to query the CMS. Depending on the application, the prerendering and caching can be at different levels of granularity ranging from small snippets (e.g., corresponding to responses to specific queries) to complete pages.

In addition to coupled and decoupled approaches to website development, progressively decoupled approaches offer another hybrid possibility. In a progressively decoupled solution, JavaScript-based “sub-pages” are embedded into a page layout that is managed by the CMS. Depending on the particular website’s needs and the technology preferences and skills of the developers, any of the coupled, progressively decoupled, or decoupled approaches could work best in a specific use case. Websites that predominantly fit typical CMS-inbuilt use cases work best in coupled and progressively decoupled modes (possibly with JavaScript-based components for specific widgets) while a fully decoupled approach better fits websites with different more dynamic interfaces or cases in which JavaScript-based front-end technologies are preferred. Another aspect to consider in a decoupled implementation is that authentication and access control need to be coordinated and handled on both the front-end and back-end sides (e.g., using cookies and OAuth) in contrast to a coupled implementation where such details are handled by built-in functionalities in the CMS.

To test functionality and performance, automated testing methodologies (e.g., using the Selenium framework) can be used as with any other websites. In the case of decoupled websites based on headless CMSs, one additional aspect to consider during automated testing is to ensure that all the REST API endpoints and interactions between the custom module and the CMS are covered in the testing including any corner cases in these code modules.

Shared templates is another recently evolving technology that is useful when developing a decoupled website. While the webpage layout functionalities of the CMS are not used in deployment since the front-end is separately developed, the content administrator might still wish to be able to preview the final webpage while configuring content in the back-end UI. Shared templates provide a flexible solution for this purpose whereby both the CMS admin UI and the browser-side JavaScript use the same templating system (e.g., Twig.js, which is a JavaScript re-implementation of the PHP-based Twig template engine used in Drupal) so that the layout templates can be processed in both the back-end and the front-end interfaces. A related technology is shared rendering which involves instead a rewriting of the CMS rendering code in JavaScript or somehow embedding the original CMS rendering code in a JavaScript program.

The Timeline Website: A Case Study of the Headless CMS Approach

The Timeline website has been recently developed at the 9/11 Memorial and Museum. This website presents an interactive timeline of the events of 9/11 along with various media content within a rich and responsive user interface. In the implementation of this website, the Drupal CMS was used as the back-end running in the headless Drupal mode (So, 2018; Buytaert, 2019; Mayekar, 2019) and the front-end was implemented using client-side JavaScript along with HTML and CSS for the presentation layer. The overall architecture of the technology stack used in the development of this website is shown in Figure 4. The structure of the interactive website from the user’s point of view is illustrated in Figure 5. At a high level, the webpage initially presents the user a list of timelines and after the user picks one of the timelines, displays a carousel view (that can be toggled between user-controlled and automatic scroll modes) of timeline items, any of which can be picked by the user to view further details on the specific timeline item.


The software technology stack used on the server side and the client side in the development of the Timeline website.

Figure 4: Technology stack used in the Timeline website.


Timeline website from the visitor's point of view. On the landing page, you are presented with welcome text and the list of timelines to choose from. Upon making a selection, each timeline is represented as carousel view of the events of 9/11 and each event can be further explored to obtain a detailed view of each event.

Figure 5: Timeline website architecture from the user’s point of view.

To enable a flexible architecture of this website, a “timeline” is represented as an abstract concept via labels (using the taxonomy module in Drupal). Additional labels can be created anytime in the Drupal administration back-end interface. Creating an additional label will automatically instantiate a new timeline within the front-end and allow interactive access to it. The user interactivity, carousel views, timeline item views, etc., are all seamlessly scalable so that new timelines can be added by simply configuring the timeline items in the admin back-end  without changing any of the front-end code. From the back-end admin interface, each timeline is specified as a sequence of timeline items (“events” or “elements”) and the temporal sequence of timeline items within a timeline is configured via weights. Events can be assigned to multiple timelines. The view of each timeline item is configured as a paragraph in Drupal along with entity references to model relationships between entities represented in the CMS. The view of each timeline item can have multiple components including audio, video, images, etc. These components can be configured from within the admin back-end and once configured, any combination of media types will be automatically shown in the front-end view. Thus, the front-end view provides a unified framework that automatically scales to addition of new timelines, new timeline items, new media components for timeline items, reconfiguration of temporal sequence of timeline items, etc. Also, timeline items in each timelines can be easily toggled to visible/disabled via a simple toggle button in the admin back-end. The admin UI is implemented as a custom module based on Drupal Views to facilitate the back-end content management. The admin UI allows arbitrary linkages between timelines, timeline items, and media (e.g., multiple timeline items can reference the same media item). The admin UI also includes an integrated search to enable quick finding of timeline items with a specific text, tag, etc. The admin UI also includes functionalities for revision history and change management, tagging (for search and optionally display in the front-end view), and configuration of aspects of the front-end such as menus.

A custom module was implemented in PHP to integrate with the CMS and provide a domain-specific mini-language for efficient communication between the web front-end and the back-end CMS. The custom module exposes REST API endpoints to retrieve the list of available timelines, lists of timeline items for each timeline, media for each timeline item, etc.  The custom module enables efficient retrieval of the specific hierarchical data structures used in the Timeline web application (e.g., media representation with multiple sub-representations). The front-end is implemented using the React JavaScript library that provides a flexible framework for building web-based dynamic user interfaces. Using an in-memory virtual DOM, React enables efficient computation of incremental updates required for refreshing the in-browser view of a webpage. The front-end code uses the Axios (https://github.com/axios/axios) JavaScript-based HTTP client for making HTTP GET requests to the server and fetching data via the response from the server-side API. The server-side custom module responds to the requests via JSON serialized representations of the retrieved hierarchical content. This fetched data is then stored in Redux (https://redux.js.org) JavaScript library that is used for maintaining the application state and to enable data sharing between the React application components On the server side, multiple Drupal modules that are included in Drupal 8 are utilized to enable headless operation including the JSONAPI, RESTful Web Services, Serialization, and HTTP Basic Authentication modules. To enable scalability, the back-end is structured such that the static files (HTML, JavaScript, CSS, etc.) can be located on a separate web server different from the server running the Drupal CMS back-end. Additionally, the back-end CMS allows the media to be stored on a separate back-end system such as Amazon S3. While the discussion above focused on the Timeline website, the headless architecture facilitates relatively simple development of other front-ends that pull from the same back-end content. In particular, we are currently developing a “time-streaming” front-end layout that would be more suitable for mobiles and other hand-held devices. In this time-streaming layout, a selected timeline is presented as a linear streaming view of events of the day on 9/11/2001 and depending on the current time, the view automatically scrolls to the event that happened around that time on September 11, 2001. This helps in providing an immersive and closer perspective to the audience.


The decoupled architecture discussed in this paper enables leveraging the specific key strengths of CMS and dynamic web front-end technologies. More broadly, this architecture based on a headless CMS will enable development of a multitude of front-ends (e.g., native desktop/mobile applications, websites, audio, VR, etc.) that all draw from the same content configured in a single back-end CMS. This can greatly reduce the work entailed in developing heterogeneous front-ends while also simplifying both the back-end content management by content administrators and the front-end interface implementation by developers skilled in each of the specific technologies.


I would like to express my appreciation for Rui Yang of the 9/11 Memorial and Museum and the 2019 summer interns (Kai Heng Chen and Andy Wang) who worked on various aspects of the implementation of the Timeline website. I would also like to thank Ms. Nancy Morrissey (SVP of Digital Products and Technology at the 9/11 Memorial and Museum) for always encouraging me to take on challenging projects and providing crucial support throughout the development and implementation process. Finally, I would like to give a big shout-out to my husband Prashanth Krishnamurthy for always motivating me to expand my boundaries and also my two small kids who have been very patient while this paper has been competing with them for my attention.


Buytaert, D. (2019). “How to decouple Drupal in 2019.” Consulted January 15, 2020. Available https://dri.es/how-to-decouple-drupal-in-2019

Heslop, B. (2018).  “History of content management systems and rise of headless CMS.” Consulted January 15, 2020. Available https://www.contentstack.com/blog/all-about-headless/content-management-systems-history-and-headless-cms

Mayekar, D. (2019). Decoupling Drupal: a decoupled design approach for web applications. New York: Springer.

Schadler, T. & M. Grannan. (2017). “The rise of the headless content management system.” Forrester. Consulted January 15, 2020. Available https://www.forrester.com/report/The+Rise+Of+The+Headless+Content+Management+System/-/E-RES132202

So, P. (2018). Decoupled Drupal in practice: architect and implement decoupled Drupal architectures across the stack. New York: Apress.

Cite as:
Nagaraja, Radha. "Losing our Heads: Leveraging Headless Content Management Systems to Bridge Dynamic Web Interfaces and Backend Content." MW20: MW 2020. Published January 16, 2020. Consulted .